218 points

“but Stephen, there are no fixed points in space. Space is relative, meaning you can only define positions relative to other things. You demand the fundamentally physically impossible of me, Stephen.”

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Ah, but using the cosmic microwave background we actually can determine a universal coordinate system to fix a point in space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

cosmic microwave

Oh, so that’s why Earth is spinning!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah, and some asshole thought it’d be cool to put fish in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The centre is hot while the outside is cold - that’s how we know it’s true

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Life is naught but a warm burrito on the rotating microwave plate of Earth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

But only related to the cosmic microwave background, which, while more universal than most other reference frames, is ultimately still arbitrary

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

North is arbitrary as well, that doesn’t mean you can’t use it for spatial referencing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It can be as arbitrary as it wants it still allows you to use relative positioning to determine a fixed point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

that sounds like you’re relating your position to something else 😏

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Why cosmic microwave background radiation? Is that any less arbitrary than e.g. the sun?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i mean if we were to communicate with aliens in another galaxy it would be the “least arbitrary” one

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, it’s the only thing we know of that can be used in the whole universe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Is it tho? Assuming there was a big bang, isnt it fair to call that origin point 0 0 0 in 3D space? Subjective space is relative, but that doesnt mean space itself is relative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

that’s not how the big bang works, the whole thing about the big bang is that it was a singularity containing all of space in a single point.
The standard analog is to take a small balloon with dots painted on it, then inflating it. The surface of the balloon is spacetime, and as it shows there is no origin, everything just gets more distant from everything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s absolutely right; there’s no special origin point in space where the Big Bang began. However, there is a specific reference frame that the Big Bang occured in, which we can measure by looking at the redshift of the cosmic microwave background left over from it. The solar system is currently moving at around 600km/s relative to that.

Interestingly, this is actually an expanding reference frame due to the universe’s expansion, so two observers locally at rest relative to it will each see the other moving away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Doesn’t the balloon have a centre of mass that we can adjust coordinates to… all the time… at millions of km per second.

Okay, I see your point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

the big bang wasn’t an explosion from a point, it was an explosion of a point in space. That one point is still expanding to this day. Everything is moving away from everything else, which wouldn’t be the case in an “ordinary” explosion. We are all still in that one point, it’s just that that point has expanded. The center of the universe is, in the literal sense of the word “literally”, everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I am the center of the universe. Got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Like one of those pills you put in water and it turns into a sponge TRex!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Im kinda trollin at this point, but in an ordinary explosion, in a vacuum without external gravity, everything would indeed have a different initial velocity and direction, so everything would be moving away from everything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So from wherever you look, the universe is expanding away from you (I.e., other things in it move away from you).

Therefore, you can see that the universe doesn’t have a centre. From this and some other a bit more complicated things, one can see that the Big Bang never had a single point but rather expanded everywhere at once when it happend. Although often called expansion from one point that is wrong.

Also technically you would need to give a time dimension as we live in 4D space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

So from wherever you look, the universe is expanding away from you (I.e., other things in it move away from you).

Wouldn’t that be the case even with a center?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So from wherever you look, the universe is expanding away from you
Therefore, you can see that the universe doesn’t have a centre.

No. The only logical explanation is that I am the center of the universe!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

the 0 0 0 0 (spacetime) orientation system would be possible if the universe was a minkowski space and thus flat, but spacetime is curvy due to relativistic effects, which prevents any sort of flat orientation like that

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m so glad you asked that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Never had that many comments in my inbox

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Think of a balloon expanding. All the dots on the surface are moving away from one another. No dot is the centre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If they are all moving away from each other, that means if you reverse time they will all converge at a single point, which would be the center.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m just going to jump on the bandwagon and helpfully say; think of the universe as a large expanding paper bag.

Initially it was flat, but then the bagger expanded it in the third dimension and put bananas in it. Imagine now that you are one of those bananas, but oh no, here comes the 2L Pepsi bottle ready to crush us. Thankfully the bagger takes us out of the bag first, puts the cola bottle in, and then puts us back in on top.

And that’s why I believe in God

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Uh what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The big bang created the universe within space. Space is literally, just space, an endless empty (as far as we know) vacuum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The big bang created the universe within space.

This is not the accepted model, it wouldn’t work with our current observations. There was no “outside” space before space started expanding. When the universe was smaller, it was also infinite but an infinitely dense medium with nothing outside of it. The whole universe was infinitely dense energy, there was no “outside” or “inside” to speak of, even the geometry of spacetime was infinitely distorted, so there was no “before” or “after” states for literally anything.

Time and space didn’t begin until the expansion event. At that point, if it were possible to be an observer, it would seem like suddenly everything stretched away in all directions from all points, and this allowed interactions and events to start occuring, which we mark as the passage of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No the big bang also created space time. The bang is the bang of space going from a point to infinite 3d space + time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We’re currently unaware of any fixed coordinate system for space itself. There may be one, we have no basis of reference for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Out of my depth here, but it seems that objective timespace coordinates can be determined while still meshing with relativity.

I’ll just leave this here so someone else can explain why I’m wrong:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_time

I know 4D spacetime can be non-euclidean, but I believe those are localized to areas experiencing relativistic extrema.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Proper time is only defined along a timelike world line, e.g. the timeline of a specific reference point / object. It’s “objective” in the sense that is true for the reference point, but other reference points may (for example) perceive distant events in a different order

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I studied general relativity last year and ACKCHYUALLY…

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Pfft! I read about it on a box of cereal 5 minutes ago and think I’ve come to some novel conclusions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

that’s a rad box of cereal

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I had to switch from existential-os. That box was making me sad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The earth is rotating, which is a non-inertial reference frame. Fido simply uses its own reference frame, which following the command is now inertial. The result is that Fido is no longer affected by gravity, and slowly floats away just as in the comic

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

good boy fido

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

This makes me sad.

Also, it’s a little inaccurate as the dog would be moving at hundreds of thousands of kilometers per hour, either burning up in the Earth’s atmosphere or plowing through its surface. Also, I don’t think dogs have the ability to do this, so there’s that.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

We have never truly tested the limits of dogs. Only the limits of what THEY think we want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What they want is to be with us, thus they would never use such a power even if they had it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Good boy. Maybe too good.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

because fixed points in space (stationary reference frames) fall inwards into gravity wells as time progresses, Fido, would need to burrow into the center of the earth. Fido should shoot into space like that if told to stay at a fixed point relative to the cosmic microwave background

permalink
report
reply

196

!onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very “off topic”.

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren’t unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don’t rush mod actions. If a case doesn’t need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

Community stats

  • 8.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments