Isn’t that just… basically everywhere?
Not in a lot of places in the US, super not in cities. Yeah you can get away without spending money but the expectation is there, and often baked into how people socialize as well
I live in a small Australian city.
There are 100s of kms of beaches, most with free BBQs and showers.
100s of kms of walks, hikes, bike paths.
There’s mountain bike stuff, skate parks, dirt jumps, basketball courts, soccer fields, lakes.
There’s loads of parks. Some of them have heaps of stuff for kids.
We have a village square also. Just a bigbgrass area in the city with free WiFi and often events and things.
All of these things are public spaces with no expectation of spending money. My city isn’t unusual in Australia.
That’s what I/we want in North America, but for some reason people always think they have to drive a vehicle to within one meter of their desired destination.
Australian’s want to drive everywhere too.
There’s a fairly commonly held distaste for cyclists here.
We don’t have these things instead of a drive-everywhere culture. We have them in addition to that.
And also that anyone existing in a place without spending money is probably a criminal, especially if they’re not white.
That concept is incompatible with capitalism, libraries must be eradicated!
Well my local library disagrees because they expect me to pay my late fees, smh.
tbh not always, at one public library I went to I was asked to pay a membership fee, even though I only wanted to sit at a desk with my laptop
That’s because in English, the word public means you can walk into without being a Lord. Which means a public space can be a private property.
In Latin derived languages, public means owned by government. So a public park, public library, public company or public university, are 100% owned by the government.
So when I studied in my public university, yes I would spend on books and food, but it has a built in rule that it is forbidden to charge students or staff for anything.