253 points

Twitter is not a utility. We really need to stop treating techbro services like utilities. If we feel they actually are utilities, the government can step in and make that claim and the appropriate changes.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

You would be shocked to know how many people use TikTok as a search engine

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m not on tiktok, but I’ll admit to using YouTube as a search engine a lot. Also googling something and immediately hitting the video tab before reading any of the results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

You video guys work different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s how I use Bing. 😻

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I liken using groogle for finding factual information to using the yellowpages for doing the same. YT isn’t much better but it suffers many of the conflicts of interest traditional media outlets also had, depending on the corporation. In this case the almighty algorithm is the conflict of interest, though there are clever content creators out there making some good stuff, they’ll always be beholden to the owners of the platform and the true customers - the advertisers. As an advertising platform which can direct punters to actual long form content directly supported by watchers via patreon or similar, I understand why it is used : the sheer numbers using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I just ask chatGPT…

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

If it’s a private company that con do what it wants, like blocking political opponents, it should not be under safe harbor protections.

That’s the point in yelling about this. If Elon wants a private forum for him and his mates, he should also be fully responsible when his mates posts child porn on his servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Which safe harbor protections?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
4 points

Holy Unholy, this is written by The Enshittification Guy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The EU has declared Twitter and a few others to be gate-keepers and they will now be held to a higher standard. But I don’t think the EU is going to use this power to save US democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I disagree. We should nationalize it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
143 points

Imagine trying winning chess when the board itself plays against you. Twitter/X must be dropped immediately, it’s a censorship-propaganda machine which is now only works for those who control it.

permalink
report
reply
-19 points

Wasn’t that the case when progressives controlled it? Either way, fk X and all other social media services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Jack Dorsey was a progressive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Anything left of “pretend minorities don’t exist” is progressive to certain people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey: I ‘fully admit’ our bias is ‘more left-leaning’

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said on Saturday that he “fully admit[s]” Twitter employees share a largely left-leaning bias after facing accusations that conservatives are discriminated against on the social media platform.

In an interview that aired Saturday on CNN, Dorsey said his company has a responsibility to be open about its political viewpoints, but to operate without bias when applying content policies to users.

”We need to constantly show that we are not adding our own bias, which I fully admit is … is more left-leaning,” Dorsey says.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Dunno, but echoes of it were sounding like Tumblr 2.0

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

If only the federal government could implement some sort of server that would allow them to self-host social media for officials and prominent candidates. I wish there were some well-known and tested service that other governments were using and they could just implement in the USA.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Sounds impossible! Does this technology even exist???

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

If only there was some Soviet Union with their own mastodon

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If they build it, will anyone come? Or does private social media only work because the user base is already scrolling endlessly there?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

@XeroxCool welcome to fediverse. I’m replying to you from mastodon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m using motion controls!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Posted multiple times because replication was slow. Oops.

Also now I’m posting from lemm.ee

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

if they build it, the press will go there and report on what’s posted there

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah wouldn’t be bad. Could be an official source to cite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This kind of event is precisely what drives things like social media adoption. If Harris and the DNC organized an actual messaging campaign and took advantage of this energy to promote Twitter alternatives, a lot of people would join.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Newsies will go there for the announcements. That’s the wedge that keeps growing.

Not all growth strategies are just having the bandwagon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I mean, it wouldn’t stop them from continuing to post to Xitter. They can do both!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think legally the Federal Government is allowed to do that. Maybe if the service is available to everyone. Now that option would be pretty cool. I’m fine with nationalized federated social media hosts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That sounds pretty shakey. Federal employees have their own email addresses, but you can’t just go ask for a .gov email address, you have to get a job with the government for one. The federal government has plenty of places that only some are allowed to post to. Now, if they were to say, only allow certain people to have accounts with no apperent rhyme or reason that would be grounds for a discrimination lawsuit, but they could simply say “any verified current or former federal elected official, federal department head, or state governor is allowed an account” and expand or shrink the scope as needed. The fediverse honestly makes that so much cleaner than something they host themselves with all of the nuances of what is and isn’t federated, the government could simply configure the federation to meet their legal and liability needs while users can stream in from any fediverse instance

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If they’re using it for campaigning, I think it’d have to be written as “… or any party nominee” or “… or anyone running for elected office.”

But yeah, the fediverse would be perfect for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

are you allowed to post on whitehouse.gov?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not for campaign related activity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points

Free speech and so on.

permalink
report
reply
87 points
*

Sigh. Not surprised… given that Musk is a hypocrite on free speech completely. It’s getting wild. I use this place now because after years of no issues… suddenly I’m shadow banned on Reddit. Instead of getting mad I just left. Screw those who would stifle others but pretend to believe the opposite.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Welcome to Lemmy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Thank you, much appreciated

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Reddit is far-right garbage run by radicals. Some instances on Lemmy are far-left garbage run by radicals, but you can route around them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You are definitely not alone. You are in good company here. Welcome aboard!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 130K

    Comments