3 points

!lemmysilver

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Thank you for voting. You can vote again in 24 hours. leaderboard

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

This in combination with deregulating the single market and allowing EU tech startup to thrive would finally give birth to real competitors on our continent

GoEU

permalink
report
reply
27 points

deregulating

Nope. Nope-nopety-nope, leave this american bullshit where it belongs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

!lemmysilver

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Thank you for voting. You can vote again in 24 hours. leaderboard

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Pardon my ignorance but what does deregulating the single Market mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There is a big push from EU at the moment to reduce “red tape” to make it easier for business, see for example mastodon post from EC a few hours ago: https://ec.social-network.europa.eu/@EUCommission/114280068967975617

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Reducing things the way it should be done. Got it. Thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
124 points
*

Maybe fix the Irish tax loophole first?

permalink
report
reply
70 points
*

Exactly. Never do anything until you can do everything all at once. If you can’t wave a magic wand and solve all problems everywhere, it’s best to just keep the status quo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Or, you know, do two things at once. It’s not uneard of for a huge governmental entity to be able to do that. And it’s stupid to repaint the ceiling when you have a leaky roof.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
5 points

A slap on the wrist for two of the tech giants is great progress. I would consider this a start, but not done yet.

The linked article supports this as well:

Tove Maria Ryding from the European Network on Debt and Development, an association of trade unions and non-governmental organisations, welcomed the ECJ’s decision but stressed “our tax problem is more than just one rotten apple”.

She said the case addressed tax matters dating back over 20 years and was “a perfect illustration of the chaotic corporate tax system we have”.

“What we urgently need is a fundamental reform that can give us a tax system that is fair, effective, transparent and predictable," she said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How would this affect the big players? Like MS -you buy from the European branch and they use buy from US. So hitting them with tariffs would hurt MS more than their customers?

I understand they will raise prices, but its not like with physical goods where the same item is resold. They use other ways to transfer money because tax

permalink
report
reply
12 points

The purpose of tariffs (in a normal world) is to make it harder for domestic entities to buy international goods. Typically, this will spur growth of a particular sector of industry within a country over time.

The way Trump is using them as a battering ram in an attempt to punish other countries, rather than incentivize steady growth, is why the US market is tanking and likely headed to another recession (or worse).

By retaliating in kind, the EU will be incentivizing their citizens and companies not to buy from the US. This will hurt companies that are based in the US, like Google, Microsoft, Meta, etc., further sending the US economy into freefall and bolstering the European economy, since they aren’t trying to punish every single trade partner in existence.

There may be other ways they try to move money around to avoid the tariffs, but governments are aware of how big businesses operate and often try to close those kinds of loopholes. Since this has become a global political issue, I would imagine they’ll be keeping a more watchful eye than normal on things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It becomes very hard to tariff intangible services like those provided by tech, or financial securities.

If the datacenter is in the EU and that EU data center is servicing EU does it get tariffed? I think they should just do shit like requiring certain infrastructure and job investments in the EU or pay higher tax rates on revenue.

Current US tax policy, GILTI and FDII already kinda incentivize offshoring for multinational companies based in the US. Companies that deal largely in intangible good are already outsourcing jobs. EU forcing them to speed up this process puts both Trump and the multinational companies in a double bind.

Neither can really make a move in their best interest without pissing the other off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

FUCKING DO IT

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 228K

    Comments