0 points
*
0 points
*
0 points
*
0 points
That’s like saying the tolerant can’t be intolerant of the intolerant, when in fact they have to be.
1 point
*
And it becomes even more viable when you consider that Popper’s idea is actually based off of a social contract.
Essentially, tolerance is based on a social contract to be tolerant to each other. If someone is being intolerant, they are explicitly and intentionally removing themselves from the contract. Ergo, they no longer fall under protections, and people can then be intolerant of their intolerance.
