Pseudoscience article. Reality looks different.
OP linked to a video, not an article. The title (BTW) is a sarcastic take on public perception of their/our behavioural changes (and other steps taken) with regards to dealing with the greenhouse effect. It (the video) is not made by a denier.
The video is basically based on other videos and they link to articles which they refer too. Within that linked video, they refer directly to some questionable articles.
If something is meant as sarcasm, please tag it as such. This is not obvious here.
Otherwise, I report this community now for delivery spreading misinformation. This is - for me - no joke, and I do not think we should communicate this.
There is also not really a point defending this, climate related stuff got worse, not better. I am absolute no fan of such jokes, especially then when one of the rule in this Community is… link to posts should come from reputable sources.