0

There is a start and a end, don´t merge into the middle(feddit.de)

posted
by
Avatar
Beni@feddit.de
in
Avatar
programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
10 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
DrM@feddit.de
0 points

I didn’t know that GitLab doesn’t allow that! We use BitBucket and there it’s extremely easy to put branch restrictions so that only certain Usergroups are allowed to merge into the release-branches

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
0 points

Bitbucket also doesn’t enforce these rules properly. You can simply change the rules, merge, then change back.

The only way around that is to restrict every developer account into oblivion and only have an ops guy as repo admin, but I think most ops teams have better things to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
DrM@feddit.de
0 points

Why should a developer be a Repo admin? Thats DevOps territory

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
0 points

That very much depends on your workflow and team setup. Repo admin for me means “can alter who and how branches can be merged”. That’s usually a job for lead devs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 6.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 796

    Posts

  • 7.3K

    Comments

Community moderators