You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points
*

I wanted to ask why it’s bad, what did you change?

Btw. the example function get_default is badly chosen, because unwrap_or_default exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The original example was doing the unwrap_within an iterator doing some string parsing, so there was a lot of unrelated boilerplate around the actual unwrapping that made it really unclear, as well as usual unwrap_or_else to produce a constant value

Ehhh, I was more using get_default as a placeholder for some function, as opposed to representing Default::default for the inner type specifically. I think it should be alright since only people familiar with rust would know about the default trait anyway. I did consider adding an unwrap_or_default example, but thought it was getting a bit off topic at that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah I get it, it was just something I noticed. A pedantic lint, you could say.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 6.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 796

    Posts

  • 7.3K

    Comments

Community moderators