“35% Smaller than Zen 4, but with Identical IPC”

It is very impressive to keep all of Zen 4’s functionality and only sacrifice frequency and L3 for almost double the core density. I hope They will release some consumer products with this in the future like a 7970x with 8 Zen4 and 16 Zen4c cores.

With the official announcement it confirmed the previous leaks, for a more detailed breakdown see: https://www.semianalysis.com/p/zen-4c-amds-response-to-hyperscale

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
0 points

Did I read that right…128 cores / 256 threads. That’s bonkers. I guess those are only useful in extremely parallel workloads, or you’ll be hitting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl’s_law limitations? I’m not a CS grad, so take this with a pinch of salt.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Yeah, at that thread count only a few workstation applications (maybe video encoding and code compilation) scale well.

The c in 4c is supposedly referring to cloud where it’s possible to run 128 tiny independent VMs on a chip like that. Being independent means those should scale linearly aside from the shared memory and IO bandwidth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Those numbers are just so wild. Very impressive :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

This is also a way to get around software that’s licensed per socket instead of per core. Allows companies to condense the number of machines and licenses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Licensing per socket is something I’ve never heard of. Interesting idea. I suppose back in the day one socket = one processor, so they’ve not moved on from that model, eh?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hardware

!hardware@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is a community dedicated to the hardware aspect of technology, from PC parts, to gadgets, to servers, to industrial control equipment, to semiconductors.

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to electronic hardware
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Community stats

  • 225

    Monthly active users

  • 175

    Posts

  • 330

    Comments

Community moderators