You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

Friedrich Engels, 1872, On authority

Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is. It is the act by which one part of the population imposes its will on the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannons — by the most authoritarian means possible; and the victors, if they do not want to have fought in vain, must maintain this rule by means of the terror which their arms inspire in the reactionaries. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if the communards had not used the authority of the armed people against the bourgeoisie? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach them for not having used it enough?

Therefore, we must conclude one of two things: either the anti-authoritarians don’t know what they’re talking about, in which case they are only sowing confusion; or they do know, in which case they are betraying the proletarian movement. In either case, they serve reaction.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

People seriously still quote On Authority? 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To this day, nobody’s actually articulated any counterpoints to it, so yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Just cause you chose to ignore the well-founded critique, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Yes, Engels does a pretty good job of explaining why “authoritarian” complaints are usually explained purely by vibes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He mostly explained how he actually didn’t really have a proper grasp of what authority actually means. He conflated them with a lot of things without actually making sense. I’m surprised why “On authority” is so widely known.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I found the quote interesting. Is the source material bad? How so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

On authority is used to justify the fact that many communist movements of the past turned into brutal dictatorships and that “it’s fine actually that mao starved half of China because you can’t have a revolution without being authoritarian”.

The actual paper is short and kind of stupid. What Engels was arguing in that short essay with a ridiculously outsized influence was that he was technically correct (the best kind) that anarchists are silly because any type of government someone could propose inevitably involves one person imposing their will on another like your quote says.

Really what Engels (who was a prominent communist thinker) was doing was fucking up any attempts at communist organization because now 1/3 of communists think that brutal authoritarianism is based and necessary for a revolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Engels conflates authority with basically everything: necessity, organization, processes, violence, self-defense, etc.

This video thoroughly debunks the essay

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 48K

    Comments