Wow, interesting to see after GN’s tariffs video.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
37 points

That’s not really how it works, which is made apparent in the video. Without going into details, IF they decided to pay for all of the product to let the buyers decide and it turns out the buyers are not interested they may not be able to recoup that cost and go out of business.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Oh, okay. That makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

It’s such a pleasant surprise when someone changes their opinion in response to new information. I feel like it shouldn’t be. Anyway, good on you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points
*

So rather than try to anticipate demand, they just cut themselves out of an entire market.

Edit: why the downvotes? This is just literally what they’ve done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Better to cut out a insane Republican market than go out of business.

Also they anticipate zero demand at these stupid Republican tariffs, hence why they’re cutting the dumbass US market out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

There’s surely nonzero demand. I’m not saying it’s the wrong move.

Also, not everyone in the US is a moron/fascist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

what do you believe the anticipation for a 130$ case will be if the same case costs 300$.

if I were them, id virtually assume the demand is 0. basically no one is paying 300 for that kind of case.

and even IF someone paid 300$ for the case, their end profit for said case would be 5$…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

All you’re doing is pulling numbers out of your ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The decision is entirely about anticipating demand, it’s about the uncertainty and craptastic approach the administration is taking with them. Making changes, sometimes multiple times daily, means companies can’t plan.

Tariffs traditionally are planned and communicated, with months or even years long timeframes for companies to plan around. Tariffs being added, removed, exclusions and inclusions changing daily means no one can plan. So the only planning they can do is to just stop. The Trump administration doesn’t know what the fuck they’re doing and will destroy the economy in the process while insisting they are doing a great job.

Hyte is not reliant on the US market, many of their competitors however are US based and reliant on the US market for their sales. They can easily be put out of business by these tariffs in the short term, further putting US businesses behind competitors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You answered your own question. They appear to have determined that there wouldn’t be demand.

permalink
report
parent
reply

PC Gaming

!pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Create post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

Community stats

  • 5.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 23K

    Comments