This guy just keeps getting more and more wonderful ❤️
Watching/playing/acquiring media without paying for it only sends the message that the demand is there; it’s just that the anti-piracy enforcement schemes haven’t been perfected yet.
If 100 million people watch this show on day one, but only 1 million paid to do so, the question is going to be “How can we force those other 99 million people to pay for this?” But if zero people watch this show, the immediate red flag will be “People used to love Harry Potter? Why aren’t they watching it now?”
You want to show that Joanne Rowling’s bigotry isn’t to be tolerated? You don’t show her that her content is still wanted; you shut her out completely.
They track torrent file downloads so they can send threatening DMCA takedown letters to people that don’t use VPNs to obfuscate their IPs. Even if you do use a VPN, they may not know who you are, but they can count the download.
Does pirating a show via streaming site circumvent this or does that get tracked too?
Counter point. If there’s a drop in subscriptions and a spike on piracy after they release, they can conclude that the best approach is to drop the show and J. Terf Rowling.
That, and have all the discourse of the show be around her bigotry.
I have to interest on the show
Counter point. If there’s a drop in subscriptions and a spike on piracy after they release, they can conclude that the best approach is to drop the show and J. Terf Rowling.
Media execs don’t see piracy as an economics or social issue. They believe it’s a technological issue and they just need to find the right silver bullet to force you to watch the content that they know you want to watch (why would you be pirating it otherwise?) while paying them for it.
No corporation has seen an increase of piracy of their content and thought anything other than “We need stricter anti-piracy measures.”
The company doesn’t care about popularity lmfao. They only care about money
Lots of media are popular that didn’t make money, but there’s no media that made lots of money that wasn’t also popular.
Money directly correlates with popularity when talking about films/books/television. Why do you think, for example, that there was only one Eragon movie despite there being four books? And yet Twilight also had four books, but had five movies made?
You seriously think the suits spending tens or hundreds of millions of dollars making movies or tv shows don’t care about what’s popular? Then why the hell are they remaking Harry Potter?
