You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points

Now define “+”

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I love the comment that it’s “occasionally useful”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hmm yes… set theory… I don’t understand anything happening here

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

There is actually a really good explanation for us math-curious non-mathematicians here:
https://blog.plover.com/math/PM.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

+ is a map from N×N to N where a + 0 = a and a + S(b) = S(a + b) (S is the successor function that gives the next number).
Then 1 + 1 = 1 + S(0) = S(1 + 0) = S(1) = 2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

seems a little sus to use + to define +

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No, it’s correct. You define the operation by it’s properties. It’s not saying that “a plus 0 = a” but “the result of applying the binary operation ‘+’ to any number with 0 should give the original number.”

  • is just a symbol. You could instead write it as +(a,0)=a and +(a,S(b))=S(+(a,b)).

You have to have previously defined 1=S(0), 2=S(1), 3=S(2), and so on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 41K

    Comments