Summary

Texas hospitals are treating children with vitamin A poisoning linked to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s promotion of the supplement as a measles treatment.

At Covenant Children’s hospital in Lubbock, patients with measles showed abnormal liver function due to excessive vitamin A intake.

Kennedy, the U.S. health secretary, claimed vitamin A dramatically reduces measles mortality. Experts warn his messaging confuses parents and downplays the proven protection of the MMR vaccine.

The U.S. faces its worst measles outbreak in decades, with nearly 500 cases across 21 states and two confirmed deaths.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-43 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

People don’t get the right to endanger our most vulnerable because they are stupid and religious.

I guess I should say stupid or religious but I have a feeling the initial statement is correct.

I agree with your other comment on not trusting insurance agencies though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

This statement is the poster child for why letting individuals use their own judgement on scientific data is such a crap idea.

*Changed medical matters to scientific data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Drug companies shouldn’t be in the equation of telling you what is best for you and your family medically.

That should be left up to doctors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not up to the experts to bend over backwards to convince you that a medication is safe and beneficial to yourself and to society. If they’ve convinced most of the population, but haven’t convinced you, then maybe you’re the problem. It’s your job to learn to distinguish between trained experts and quacks with an agenda, and listen to the experts, not the quacks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This would still respect choice while cutting back on the utilization of emergency services covered by insurance companies. It could lead to reduced costs and people who pay into insurance shouldn’t be forced to pay for the negative health outcomes of people who willingly flout preventative health measures. It drives up costs for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You don’t get what I’m saying. Insurance companies aren’t making the choice for consumers. Consumers refuse to take preventative health measures, that is the choice they make. Insurance in turn, refuses to provide coverage to them because they willingly cost them more in the long run. Medicare and Medicaid, what will be left of them, should also refuse to cover them. Let these consumers cover their own healthcare costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Sure sure, but should parent be allowed to forego low-risk, high-efficacy medical advice to the long term detriment of their child’s and other children’s health? Children, who are unable to legally advocate for themselves…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

If you were a good parent, you’d read up on what the risks were for vaccinations vs catching the disease and realize that even the worst performing vaccines are 300+ times less dangerous than an infection, instead of relying on Jenny McCarthy’s fucking Facebook posts as a source of medical information.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Well if the people that tell you what to take are the ones that you go to when you are Ill because you didn’t want to listen to them, they should be able to refuse you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Why go to the doctors then? Just take whatever pink medicine your best friend/shaman/faith healer recommends and accept your fate. Why after choosing your medication and you and yours get fucked up, you rush to the hospital?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Tough shit plague rat

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Yes. I would 100% enjoy mandatory vaccinations when those vaccines are standardized, well regulated, and proven to save countless lives. I want to be forced to take the shot, I want the person to my right to be forced, I want the person to my left to be forced.

I want to save people from horrible death and lifelong disability. I want to eradicate diseases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If the thing has been proven time and time again to be a benefit for the entire society?

Yes.

Only someone clearly deranged and selfish would choose otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

!health@lemmy.world

Create post

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you’re not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 5K

    Comments