You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
125 points

I don’t get how these people even feel comfortable driving something where you can’t see the road that’s in front of you for 10+ meters out. I just wouldn’t feel safe, there could be any kind of obstruction you can’t see on the road from 10m away but will still fuck up your day and/or life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

As a truck driver I get it. It’s nice to see more. The tradeoff isn’t worth it and not why they do it. I would bet my paycheck they never take it off road either. Which would be the only good reason to raise something that much. Truckers have a good reason to. They have giant engine and transmissions that need to last for the industrial work involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

cabovers are almost exclusively used throughout europe and asia. it’s only america and australia that tends to use the big bonnet american style trucks.

there no real reason for it

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

To be fair the regulations on vehicle length and older infrastructure makes the cabover popular.

American style trucks(long nose) get better mileage on longer hauls than the blunt nose design. They also provide more cabin room. As a final note American audiences are conditioned for the long nose design and it’s difficult to find the imports here.

Having driven both I think they both have merit. In Europe an American truck would be impossible to maneuver in towns.

So that’s the “real reason for it”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

A lot of trucking is long-range. America is fucking big and not everywhere is served by ports, railroads, and tributaries.

Those roof-scoops and curvaceous hoods aren’t just for being sexy. They greatly increase aerodynamics and with it, range.

The important thing is that it requires specialized training and a license to drive something with such poor visibility. The pickups, any 16yo kid can legally drive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There is a reason for it: Regulations that limit the overall vehicle length. The EU has a lower maximum than the U.S., so it favors the cabover design, which allows a longer trailer. The U.S. had lots of cabover trucks on its roads until it increased the allowed length, when truckers took advantage of the easier maintenance and better ergonomics of the bonnet design.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think there is a legal reason for no cabovers in the USA. Maybe something based on crash safety (for just the occupants of course).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There is a reason in Australia, the distances travelled and the enormous loads they haul require far more powerful trucks. Look up road trains. They are significantly more efficient than using multiple trucks.

Trains would be more efficient but Australia is too large and too sparsely populated to do everything with trains.

They are also safer for the driver than the Cab over style.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I would kill for a 4x4 cab over in the states to replace my 2500. The offerings here don’t compare.

2500 Desiel - 21000lb towing // Isuzu NPR desiel - 14500lb towing

Both are the same price at around $68000

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

but you don’t actually see more, that’s kinda the whole point here?

maybe you see over other cars but you lose sight closer to you

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You see more further down the road. Which you need when it takes 4 to 8 times longer to stop depending on conditions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They don’t look or care. Their car is big enough that they’ll plough right through a bunch of kids before they even notice they’re on the sidewalk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It’s simple uneducated hubris. Nothing bad could ever happen to them because they are a Good American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

If they thought about things and came to good conclusions afterwards, they probably wouldn’t be driving this kind of car to begin with. The people who are driving it are probably not good thinkers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have one of these out of necessity. I don’t understand getting one as a daily driver for someone to go to their office job and pick up groceries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Agreed, but some people drive that way. It’s their road, get out of the way. I had a 1996 Dodge dually long ago for pulling a trailer, and its visibility wasn’t very bad, except for around the damn side columns. I got into the habit of leaning forward and back as I would turn so that I had some idea of what was being blocked. At one point we had considered upgrading to the big trucks like the F-450/F550, and I got into one to see what it was like. I could see EVERYTHING. I was like, holy shit, this is luxury.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Side columns like that should be illegal. I was driving my stepdad’s '21 Silverado 1500 crew cab a few weeks ago and was totally blown away when I almost pulled out in front of someone coming from the right in a big ass truck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This attitude is really prevalent here. As in you don’t really need to see the road, just the car in front.

People scream blue bloody murder about bikes on the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Looking at those dumbfucks driving their emotional support vehicle in the city, they don’t seem to be comfortable

They are driving slow and can’t stay in their lane, as they can’t judge the distances correctly

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Emotional support vehicle? Don’t you mean Gender Affirmation Vehicle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They don’t care, as long as they get to drive their behemoth and feel powerful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I have a Chevy 2500 to tow my RV (needed for the weight and it’s my home) and I hate not being able to see shit. I would gladly replace it with a cab over if they brought them to the states. The truck only gets used to move the RV from site to site and I have small single cylinder motorcycles to get around because fuck parking that thing anywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That would require rational thought

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 5.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 845

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments