we appear to be the first to write up the outrage coherently too. much thanks to the illustrious @self

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

I’m taking it as a positive sign that the Proton story’s gaining traction, as it should. this thing is a massive fucking security risk and a bad sign of things to come for Proton, and more people should be talking about it.

but between the dishonesty on Proton’s part about the survey and the types of accounts that’ve come out of the woodwork to unabashedly support this trainwreck of a feature (the pattern’s especially clear on mastodon), boy, there’s a lot of stank on this one

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

you can see they are actively monitoring the masto discourse and responding whenever they think their justification list has any merit https://hci.social/@protonprivacy@mastodon.social/with_replies

but they are already saying stuff out of sync with their promotional material so damage control does appear to be in action

e.g.

Thanks for the feedback everyone. Just to be clear, Proton Scribe is:

  • only for business users, who have asked for it

https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/112814751983760603

but their site says

Who can use Proton Scribe? We are currently rolling out Scribe to eligible users. If you’re on a Proton Business plan, including Mail Essentials, Mail Professional, and Proton > Business Suite, you can try Proton Scribe for free for 14 days. If you’re on our Visionary plan, it’s included with your plan.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240719203115/https://proton.me/support/proton-scribe-writing-assistant

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

bit of a whoopsie walkback after caught pants down

totes normal. everyone has this all the time, amirite?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

let’s see how many steps they take back

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

fuck, the pure PR fluff they’re posting in response to “hey fucknuts, this thing breaks your fucking security model”. I’ve dropped other companies for doing this “uhh no it doesn’t, trust us” shit before. if they had proof this thing’s secure they would’ve posted it by now, but they don’t (because it isn’t, it’s broken by design) so instead they have to post this horseshit

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I highlighted another nice dig by weizenbaum this afternoon which your “broken by design” reminded me of:

“These gigantic computer systems have usually been put together (one cannot always use the word designed) by teams of programmers, whose work is often spread over many years. By the time these systems come into use, most of the original programmers have left or turned their attention to other pursuits. It is precisely when such systems begin to be used that their inner workings can no longer be understood by any single person or by a small team of individuals.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators