By providing an underaged child access/directions to adult - pornographic material, for one. That in of itself should be considered disseminating indecent material to minors.
Actually thatâs a good project to conduct⊠baiting librarians to see if theyâre willing to guide children to material that is deemed indecent.
I want to assume youâre a good person so Iâm going to let you know: limiting a teenagerâs access to books that discuss sex in a healthy way isnât corrupting them. Educators that want them to have access to this arenât groomers.
Sex/sexuality are part of human nature, and every teen is developing a sense of self that will include these aspects. If they donât have curated materials to learn from, theyâll seek these out themselvesâthrough the internet. Porn is an awful and unhealthy way to learn about this stuff.
Outrage media will try to tell you that first grade teachers are giving instructions for sex acts, and thatâs just demonstrably untrue.
So why canât educators stick to the state mandated sex ed programs? Why veer off the curriculum standardized by the state?