Comment by StaySquared@lemmy.world on OK at it Again

Source: me, high school librarian

groomer*

Fixed.

The Brooklyn Public Library’s Books Unbanned project makes its collection available to young adults and teens who face censorship, book bans, and political challenges. The collection includes thousands of audiobooks and ebooks, which can be accessed on a computer, Kindle, or phone or tablet using the Libby app. Some books in the collection include:

Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe

All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. Johnson

The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison

It really says something about your worldview that you automatically assume any librarian is a groomer

Any librarian that supports child grooming and child groomers*

How… are you able to determine that?

By providing an underaged child access/directions to adult - pornographic material, for one. That in of itself should be considered disseminating indecent material to minors.

Actually that’s a good project to conduct… baiting librarians to see if they’re willing to guide children to material that is deemed indecent.

I ask you to look up what books are in this books unbanned project and point to the pornography. Or do you truly believe books about mental health, LGBTQ and diversity awareness are pornography?

I want to assume you’re a good person so I’m going to let you know: limiting a teenager’s access to books that discuss sex in a healthy way isn’t corrupting them. Educators that want them to have access to this aren’t groomers.

Sex/sexuality are part of human nature, and every teen is developing a sense of self that will include these aspects. If they don’t have curated materials to learn from, they’ll seek these out themselves–through the internet. Porn is an awful and unhealthy way to learn about this stuff.

Outrage media will try to tell you that first grade teachers are giving instructions for sex acts, and that’s just demonstrably untrue.

So why can’t educators stick to the state mandated sex ed programs? Why veer off the curriculum standardized by the state?

Being able to read opens access to the written pornographic material. Being able to write enables accidentally writing pornographic sentences. Please unlearn reading and writing as the first thing you do tomorrow.

A BlazeTV link. I didn’t see that coming… but I should have

Oh, let me know if you need more videos of children and parents and communities reading some of the literature… I can assure you, BlazeTV is the least of your worries.

If you think that having an option to learn about life and know something about it before being exposed to the dangers going blind into an experience is bad and grooming, I have news for you. You have been groomed into being a breeder-only type of human being with all these anti sex-education (even optional for only those who seek it) showing it.

Go breed like rabbits and shut up about people learning how to safely engage in sex and how to turn it into an enjoyable experience rather than a sneaky risky fleeting act that can put on them lifelong unwanted responsibilities.

So you support child grooming, got it.

Can you define the word “civility” for me? Or are you just going to call me a groomer too because I don’t agree with you either?

How is letting someone know about the facets of a topic is preparing them to use abused in that topic? Especially without an agent meddling in between. What, will the books themselves have sex?

I’m aware that enough knowledge about sex and reproduction alone does not warrant a valid consent for sex just by itself and there are many more matters that should be taken into account, including enough experience in regular life matters to understand the scope of agreement for it, which a child or teen would not have, but at least enabling access to the material by which they can learn about it on their own volition is a good start to construct personal identity.

Ask the fucking priests that touched you in places and called it something bullshit like putting god in you if they support anyone learning and constructing their own sexual identity through intermediary-free inanimate objects is safe and sound, you’ll get probably get more touching as they teach you what they think.

Do you truly think everyone constantly telling you you’re wrong and disagreeing with you vehemently makes you more correct?

No… I’m well aware that this community is a leftist/progressive community and your form of progress is a degenerate, decaying form of progress. And when I see something absurd, I call it out or at the very least question it. You’re right, I’m wrong, because I go against the grain. And you feel like you’re right because of your collectivism. Doesn’t make it right nor moral.

Do you really think you’re right just because everyone else thinks you’re wrong? Jesus

I think there’s people whose moral compass doesn’t align with the common man on earth. And said people just see themselves as progressives for the better good without actually thinking about the repercussions. You may feel you’re doing something right, but in reality it’s negatively impactful.

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that’s fine.

There’s other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

OK at it Again(lemmy.world)

US Authoritarianism

!usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world

Community stats

Community moderators