You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points
*

yeah, cause Donald trump doesn’t support genocide too.

There’s no discussion here. You get one or the other.

No amount of not voting changes the result to the point where you aren’t getting Trump or Biden.

With trump you lose the progress people have fought for. With Biden you get status quo bullshit. At least the status quo preserves the efforts of the past people can still build on in the future. It’s a non argument. Every one of your points is irrelevant for this election right now.

So I guess we gotta realize you’re just a bot after all. This election matters. Every election matters. But progress isn’t only made during major presidential elections, there’s plenty of ways to keep moving the needle outside of this. I won’t be wasting further time with you. But hopefully people reading don’t fall into the same trap you have or are paid to present.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Don’t forget: if we get Trump and manage to continue to have elections, the DNC can and will throw up an even shittier pro-corporate, center-right candidate against Trump and still claim the high ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I love this. It’s a perfect example. If we manage to continue having elections is on the ballet. It’s actually in question.

The other side being crap is completely irrelevant at that point. It’s absurd that I of all people am telling you to vote for Joe Biden, who I don’t agree with about anything. I think Bernie was too to the right for me personally.

Do there need to be fundamental changes? Absolutely, when you can’t vote for anyone at all it’s going to be much harder to affect the change you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I disagree.

An end to the farce that is democracy in America would actually make it easier to affect change, because we wouldn’t be wasting time yelling at each other to vote anymore and could actually focus on direct action.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yeah, cause Donald trump doesn’t support genocide too.

No. Fuck this. GOP supporting a genocide does not make it ok for Democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s not the point. There is not a candidate on the ballot that can win that doesn’t support it.

Which is why the only option for people who actually believe genocide support is non-negotiable is voting Uncommitted.

Joe Biden is not minimizing Israel’s genocide, he’s actively facilitating it to the maximum extent. There’s no way for you to vote Joe Biden and pretend you’re the anti-genocide. No amount of rhetorical backflips will change that you’re voting for a genocide supporter.

You might not like that hard realization that that is what you are now, but that’s what your vote communicates to Democrats; “I accept genocide support as part of the party platform and am willing to go as far to the extreme right as you want, as long as the otherside is slightly more to the right. I’ll never revolt.”

[…] very real chance of making progress in the future?

There is no progress through a party that supports genocide. None. That’s already been established historically. You’re essentially voting exactly like a Republican from the 80s-90s, that’s your “progress”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Progressive Politics

!progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 741

    Posts

  • 4.8K

    Comments

Community moderators