The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia’s ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points

Except you have no emperical basis for judging the accuracy of those odds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Actually I do. Simply look at injured people because of nuclear power and compare them to injured people because of any alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Irrelevant to storing nuclear waste for 10000 years, which was what I was talking avout

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

well we’ve been storing nuclear waste for decades so we can extrapolate

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s like saying we don’t know if the sun will come up tomorrow, because we can’t see in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Green Energy

!energy@slrpnk.net

Create post

everything about energy production

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 287

    Posts

  • 1.1K

    Comments