The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia’s ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

Some countries have sun, some don’t. They might need nuclear. That is the reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Which countries? The UK is famous for its cloudy weather, yet solar is feasible there. Finland and Sweden are building more and more solar. Not sure where you’re talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

UK has wind.

I’m taking east Europe for instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

FWIW, Baltic countries are going hard for solar, see https://lemmy.world/post/17098210

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why does eastern Europe get less sunlight?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Darkovia has zero sun

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Until a weather event blocks out most of the sunlight. An extreme scenario would be what happened to the dinosaurs, however smaller scale versions or that, such as large volcano eruptions, seem entirely possible and could heavily restrict the amount of sunlight you have access to for long periods of time.

Portugal lies in Southern Europe, we get plenty of sun, and we make heavy use of solar, but that still isn’t enough sometimes, and I’m pretty sure we sometimes get our energy from Spain, who themselves use nuclear.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Green Energy

!energy@slrpnk.net

Create post

everything about energy production

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 406

    Posts

  • 1.6K

    Comments