You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
103 points

Bitcoin is estimated to consume 172 TWh, which is way more than Google and Microsoft combined.

https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption

permalink
report
reply
-41 points
*

172 TWh per year

Your statement was as useful as the following: A VW Polo car costumes 3000 liters of fuel.

*Edit: Downvote me all you want 😂 if I am right I am right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

In 2023, Microsoft and Google consumed 48 TWh of electricity (24 TWh each).

Your point?

The data in the article was for one year. This is the same unit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

The comment was 172TWh without specifying a timeframe whatsoever. Is it a year? Is it a day? A month?

It was about the comment about bitcoin, not the post itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

In 2023, the two tech companies

The article is also about per year

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes it is. But your comment still doesn’t make sense until you add “per year”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The downvotes aren’t because you’re wrong, they’re because you’re bring obnoxious about being right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So, is Watt-hours/unit-time no longer a meaningful unit?

Because, if so, you better tell every power company I’ve had, because that’s how they’ve billed me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

WattHours is a unit of work. If you say that bitcoin uses x amount of Wh it doesn’t say shit about how much it actually consumes. Because you don’t say in what amount of time Bitcoin uses said amount of work, you cannot compare it. I could state, that Bitcoin uses 5 Wh. Which would also be correct.

Its the same as saying, Bob eats 5 apples. Alice eats 2000 apples. Can you compare the two? No, because what I forgot to mention is, that Bon eats 5 apples a week and Alice eats 2000 apples in 3 years. Now i can compare the two.

Do you get my point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yes, bitcoin is trash. But most modern cryptos use far less energy. For example the second largest crypto ethereum uses almost no energy compared to bitcoin/AI..

“AI” can not say the same at all. And, unlike crypto, there’s no realistic improvement in sight. It just keeps getting worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

PoS requires significant staker profits to work, which would create the same inequality as the dollar has. It’s basically dollar bonds but without regulations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There’s more to “AI” than just ChatGPT…

I think you’re mixing up what AI actually means here, you would probably like this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGIpdiQrFDU

But in brief, what about DLSS? The ML models for that get improved with every driver update.

STT models like whisper that are great at transcribing/translating.

Object recognition models for drones to keep the camera centered on you and for object avoidance.

ML models for finding new cures.

Models in astronomy for finding planets… Etc.

You’re trying to tell me that everything “AI” is trash and not getting better?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments