You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
103 points

Also, the development and evolution of these open technologies relies on human interest and attention, and that attention can be diminished, even starved, by free, closed offerings.

Evil plan step 1: make a free closed alternative and make it better than everything else. Discord for chat, Facebook for forums and chat/email, etc.

Step 2: wait a few years, or a decade or more. The world will largely forget how to use the open alternatives. Instant messengers, forums, chat services, just give them a decade to die out. Privately hosted communities, either move to Facebook, pay for commercial anti-spam support, spend massive volunteer hours, or drown in spam.

Step 3: monetize your now-captive audience. What else are they going to use? Tools and apps from the 2000s?

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

We are facing a very real possibility of the end of the web browser as we know it. Google owns the chromium engine. Mozilla is on ever more precarious footing. It’s become logistically impossible to build competing products except for tech giant. Even then everybody else gave up and went with chromium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

And Mozilla is largely funded by Google. We all just hope they don’t pull the rug from them but I have no faith that our inept, slow government would stop that from happening before it’s too late.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Almost certainly the entire reason Google is funding Mozilla is to try and stave off antitrust lawsuits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s why I’m rooting for Ladybird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I find it kinda ironic that they communicate over Discord, but it looks interesting

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I appreciate you making me aware of such an amazing project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

But nntpd is still out there. Rebuilding Usenet will suck. But it’s not impossible. Start from the net2 sites again.

Old mail RFCs included an instant message channel. I’m sure I saw code in either sendmail or uw-imap for it too.

I like the fediverse, but the old ways are still valid for their particular payload.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

for chat there’s IRC or bit more modern XMPP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Usenet:

Edit: I’m talking about step 3

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

aka Enshittification

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 6.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 82K

    Comments