You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
5 points
*

Any way of estimating when the last lineages of organisms not descended from the LUCA died out?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

No, since everything we know about the LUCA is from its descendants. Microorganisms without descendants wouldn’t leave behind any evidence of their existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Using genetics alone, sure. But maybe there’s fossil or geochemical evidence of early organisms not belonging to any of the three surviving domains—or maybe we could estimate it just from statistics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe but I don’t think fossil evidence has enough information to confirm something isn’t from the main branch of the tree of life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Wouldn’t LUCA by definition be the last common ancestor of every organism of which we have evidence? If so then by definition we wouldn’t have evidence of those other lineages. Or is it just the last common ancestor of everything currently alive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

The definition I’ve seen is the last common ancestor of procaryotes, eucaryotes, and archaea—which doesn’t strictly rule out the possibility of extinct domains whose existence we might infer.

And actually, there’s evidence of non-LUCA-descended organisms mentioned right in the paper: the other organisms that constituted the ecosystem of which LUCA was a part, whose existence (and some of whose characteristics) could be inferred from LUCA’s metabolism and immune system.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<— rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 682

    Posts

  • 6K

    Comments