You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

Your speakers are analog. They sound different when they are dusty. Your ears are analog. Things sound different when you have dirty ears. Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem only applies when there are no frequencies outside of the sample range, which doesn’t happen in real life. None of this matters, because like I said it’s trivial to have orders of magnitude more accuracy than you need. Digital is just way cheaper to copy accurately, so that’s why it has become dominant, and that’s fine, but the idea that it’s inherently more representative of reality is just gibberish.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It is inherently more representative of reality. Measurably so. Vinyl doesn’t and cannot have the same dynamic range as digital.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You know that vinyl is not the only way of recording analog information, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There is also cassette tapes, reels, wax cylinders, laser discs… Analog supports degrade over time. Digital files do not.

permalink
report
parent
reply