You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-31 points

Me: “Rent seeking is an illegitimate practice, landlords steal money from laborers by extorting them for a necessary good!”

You: “Oh yeah? Why don’t you just buy your own land and build your own apartment building?”

You’re a dumbass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Lmao, thanks for demonstrating my point for me better than I ever could.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

What point? That you’re a corporate bootlicker?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That you’re like, 12 years old? Or at least have the fundamental world view of a 12 year old.

Fukkin lmao “steam is a necessity they owe me to make it cheaper”

Get the fuck back to reddit child. Enjoy your block.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

How is Valve supposed to pay for the infrastructure and maintenance without charging devs for using their enormous platform? I’m genuinely curious what ideas you have. Disregard everyone’s non-sequiturs here, please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

By charging 3% instead of 30%? Do you really think their servers cost $8.5b? Does the work to distribute a game and process payment equal 30% of the labor required to make a game?

A more advanced answer would be a cost plus profit model, so if it costs Valve $1 to transfer 1TB of data transfer (in terms of server costs), then charge $1.10 for 1TB. That’s obviously very difficult to calculate though I bet Valve has some internal metric of costs.

Valve today does the exact thing Unity was trying to do, charging a percent of revenue for providing infrastructure. Unity got raked over the coals for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Unity was changing the rules after they were already set in place. Valve has never done such a move.

Imagine though if steam suddenly went to a flat fee per install instead of charging the 30% of the sale on their platform.

They would rightly be raked over the coals. But they won’t make such a dumb fucking move because it’s a dumb fucking move.

I’m not one for Corpos but as far as attacking them goes valve is certainly near the bottom of the list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Side note: Valve isn’t doing the thing Unity tried to do. Unity tried to charge you every time someone installs the game. And you’re not even hosting the game’s data on Unity’s servers.

Steam takes money when you purchase, then will let you download it for free, anytime, anywhere, and on any device. Completely different.

Back on topic: It would be really interesting to see the actual server and bandwidth costs for hosting and distributing all those games. There’s no way it’s super low, or any of the competition surely would have caught up by now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 91K

    Comments