Alternative sources to avoid further applications of rule 1 on this post:
US Navy faces its most intense combat since World War II against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels
The U.S. Navy Is Sinking in Middle East Sand
Navy faces most intense running sea battle since WWII with Houthis
US Navy pilots come home after months of shooting down Houthi missiles and drones
I’m not Iranian, I am Arab-American and here’s an article from AP
US Navy faces its most intense combat since World War II against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels
And here’s a Time article
The U.S. Navy Is Sinking in Middle East Sand
And here’s an article from Navy Time
Navy faces most intense running sea battle since WWII with Houthis
Oh and this AP story via MSN has the quotes in the .ir source:
“It was incredibly different,” Orloff said. “And I’ll be honest, it was a little traumatizing for the group. It’s something that we don’t think about a lot until you’re presented with it.”
So you: 1. attacked the messenger without even caring to refute it with a source 2. assumed where I was from wrongly, and 3. assumed the article is false simply due to the top level domain. This tacit racism is not something I should waste time on. I shouldn’t have to back an already factual story with western sources to appease you.