You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

I don’t argue with genocide deniers

permalink
report
parent
reply

Native Americans

Latinx immigrants

Palestinians

Sudanese

Jewish people

Working class people

Asian people

Many Central and South American groups

You are being ignorant by asking “by what metric” for a nation founded on genocide

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Jewish people

you’re comparing the us’s genocide to nazi germany and jewish people were the ones you chose to bring up?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. We have been worse than Nazi Germany. Objectively. Do you deny historical facts?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

literally no part of my reply was denying genocide that the us has participated in

permalink
report
parent
reply

OK so what is your problem with returning the land and power to indigenous groups? You surely don’t support the United States of America with its history of genocide, slavery, imperialism, and colonialism? Surely you would celebrate the downfall of a state worse than that of Nazi Germany whose most progressive leader (by its own adminission) is a genocide-supporter and border fascist. fascist.

Surely the Indigenous groups wouldn’t be worse than the blue or red ghouls?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

oh no it’s time for circles

what’s your plan for returning power to indigenous people without involving a group that’s currently in power (and therefore predominantly white, since racism exists), without having right wing populists use the power vacuum to seize control?

again, a group of people that’s been oppressed to the degree native americans have is not in a position to govern a nation like america

do you deny the oppression that native americans have faced?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And you are denying the genocide that’ll happen to those indigenous you propose are going to somehow take over the country.

  1. The military. There is at least one greedy general out there that’ll attack with our trillions worth of weapons research.
  2. The nature of the indigenous communities. Okay, so you’re giving them to “the Native Americans”. I’m assuming that means all of them? Look at this infograph. They occupy less than 10% of USA’s land and are spread out incredibly sparsely. If you just give it to one of them, well, that actually would solve a problem. But which one will you give it to? Is the Fox nation racially superior to the Sioux nation? If you give it to all them, they will have to effectively communicate, which is undercut by
  3. The nature of the indigenous communities. Quite a bit of these communities have been recognized by the government as wards of the state and have been isolated by mutual consent. Now you’re gonna entrust someone to hand them modern communications, weapons, tools, etc and not use these technologies to take power away from the indigenous instead. How exactly do you propose a power transfer to happen?
permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m not reading all that

I’m happy for you tho

Or sorry that happened

permalink
report
parent
reply