…And if it weren’t for that one joke by Hannibal, Bill Cosby would be very uncontroversial.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
2 points
*

TracingWoodgrains seems to have developed, in the process of leaving mormonism, an obsession with seeking out contrarianism. But more importantly, he openly admits to being racist/HBD “align[s] broadly with informed experts that the distribution of genetic traits associated with intelligence is non-zero” and “questions of genetics and IQ, including when it comes to group differences, are worth taking seriously”. As such, he only considers it “racism” if it’s “racial crassness and antagonism”.

In which TW names who he thinks is treating the topic with the seriousness it demands without sinking to crassness: our good good friend Cremieux.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Woow, TIL. I thought he was halfway decent from the way he flatly called sailer a racist (low bar I know), but his consistent fraternization with Hannania seemed strange to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

align[s] broadly with informed experts that the distribution of genetic traits associated with intelligence is non-zero

Now I’m not the smartest cookie in the bakery but I know a dog-whistle when I see it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

no type of racist is more rabid than the genteel racist

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the distribution of genetic traits associated with intelligence is non-zero

This doesn’t even make sense. What the fuck is a zero distribution? A probability distribution cannot be “zero” in any sensible meaning of the word. Did you mean uniform?

Also obv citation needed you sack of spuds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

zero distribution is what they got, the day sense and awareness were handed out

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think he is trying to say something like “non-zero skew”, but really, he just means “I subscribe to race science, but only for the articles”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think you’re being too generous. What they wanted to say is “There are genetic traits associated with intelligence.” However, not inserting probability distributions in every fucking sentence is a class 2 misdemeanor in Rat circles, hence what was written.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is “informed experts” really an accurate description to use over “other racists?”

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 206

    Monthly active users

  • 139

    Posts

  • 2.1K

    Comments