I’m trying to get a gauge of what people here are interested in.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
7 points

Big fan of long-form science fiction. Bladerunner 2049 is fantastic, as is Stalker by Tarkovsky.

Tarkovsky in particular has brilliant works.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Sci Fi top 6 ‐ focusing a bit on the soft sci-fi

  1. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) dir: Stanley Kubrick

  2. Arrival (2016) dir: Denis Villeneuve

  3. Her (2013) dir: Spike Jonze

  4. BladeRunner (1982) dir: Ridley Scott

  5. Children of Men (2006) dir: Alfonso Cuarón

  6. GATTACA (1997) dir: Andrew Niccol

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Little known fact: all mattes are shot on first generation film. Kubrick would shoot the matte, put the film in storage, put it back in camera, then shoot the inside of the matte. It looks pristine to this day because there was no generation loss since there was only one generation even in the most effects heavy shots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If you haven’t seen it, Ex Machina (2014) fits the vibe of your list. It’s one of my favorites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’ve seen it. I enjoyed it very much.

I picked Her for my A.I. entry because it was so much simpler, more understated, and close to our everyday experiences.

I also skipped Primer (2004) because I steered clear of time travel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I can recognize 2001 as being incredible and inspiring for its time, but it doesn’t hold up very well. By modern standards, it is painfully boring and tedious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Disagree, I think 2001 is perfect. Yes it’s slow, but that’s intentional, it’s part of the feeling of the film.

Modern standards don’t really apply, because I don’t think anyone nowadays is trying to do what Kubrick was, nor (obviously) was he trying to live up to any standards of future movie making.

Each to their own of course, but wanted to put a friendly counterpoint :-)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Actually, I’m wondering now what you thought of the 2002 Solaris remake. I’ve not seen the Tarkovsky version, and I’m assuming you have. Of his other films, I’ve heard of Stalker. Recommend any others specifically?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Haven’t seen either of Solaris, but the big deal here is that the US version loses a lot of Tarkovsky’s specific, drawn out and contemplative styling in favor of a more active and dynamic version for the US.

Andrei Rublev and Mirror are standouts, to my knowledge, and are generally seen as better than Solaris but not quite as great as Stalker.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments