goddamn, did chatgpt create his answers

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
0 points

I wonder if that 30% is an accurate assessment of the time saved when they stop taking the llmcode inputs seriously in review

permalink
report
reply
1 point

@froztbyte @dgerard

If every other measure is equal, and there are 30% more human fingers created, that means EA is 30% more efficient, by this measure. 13-fingered soccer players.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

i don’t know where that number could actually have come from. i mean it came from his arse, but which analyst report did he have ready to vaguely justify it if he ever had to

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

just vibes

below 30% is “why bother”, above 30% is suspiciously “wait how”. 30% is nice and cozy, with not too many questions

totes the kind of efficiencies you could squeeze out by checks notes “eliminating human friction on delivery”

imagine all those pesky questions from minions going away! progress!

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators