1 point
I mean if the point is that we know that we know nothing then I’ll agree.
1 point
Not my point… and you know it. My point is that even if we consider that proven theorems are known facts, we still dont know if hypercomputers are infeasible. We know, however, that i’ll never write python code that decides Validity because it is not (classically) decidable. But we have no theorems on the impossibility of hypercomputation.
1 point
Back to the context though: If the brain can access it, why would AGI be unable to?
1 point
