Hello everyone,

I recently came across an article on TorrentFreak about the BitTorrent protocol and found myself wondering if it has remained relevant in today’s digital landscape. Given the rapid advancements in technology, I was curious to know if BitTorrent has been surpassed by a more efficient protocol, or if it continues to hold its ground (like I2P?).

Thank you for your insights!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points

I wish there was a decentralised way of hosting websites. Kind of like torrents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Sounds like maybe what you’re looking for is ipfs? https://ipfs.tech/

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Problem with IPFS, is that it’s not really that decentralized as I wish it was. Since by default the data is not shared across the network, meaning if nobody is downloading and hosting that node, you are still the only one having a copy of the data. Meaning if your connection is gone or if you get censored, there is no other node where the IPFS data is living. It only works if somebody else is activily downloading the data.

Ow, and then you also need to Pin the content, or the data will be removed again -,-

Furthermore, the look-up via DHT is very slow and resolving the data is way too slow in order to make sense. People expect today max 1 or 2 seconds look-up time + page load would result in 4 or 5 seconds… Max… However with IPFS this could be 20, 30 seconds or even minutes…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

That’s just for files though. Imagine a specific decentralised protocol for hosting websites.

You can technically host a website on IPFS but it’s a nightmare and makes updating the website basically impossible 2021 wikipedia IPFS Mirror. A specific protocol would make it far more accessible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Websites are just files. For something like running a site on ipfs, you’d want to pack everything into a few files, or just one, and serve that. Then you just open that file in the browser, and boom, site.

I’m not really sure it qualifies as a web site any more at that point, but an ipfs site for sure. Ipfs has links, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m personally trying to fix it… https://libreweb.org. Still a proof of concept though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Looks really cool. Thanks for the share

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why MIT license and not something like GPLv3?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

MIT license is more permissive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That would be very cool, I know we have onion sites that operate on the Tor network that use keypairs for the domains, but the sites themselves are still centrally hosted by a person, anonymously hosted but still centrally hosted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

There is actually a JS library called Planktos that can serve static websites over BitTorrent. I don’t know how good it is, but it sounds like a starting point.

https://github.com/xuset/planktos

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s some cryptobro projects about sticking distributed file sharing on top of ~ THE BLOCKCHAIN ~.

I’m skeptical, but it might actually be a valid use of such a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Blockchain is a nice technology, but not all the solutions need blockchain technology. Just like BitTorrent doesn’t require blockchain, a decentralized internet alternative also doesn’t need blockchain.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments