484

Pride Versioning(lemmy.ml)

posted
by
Avatar
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
in
Avatar
programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
18 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
Rogue@feddit.uk
20 points

I think is the logic used for Linux kernel versioning so you’re in good company.

But everyone should really follow semantic versioning. It makes life so much easier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
3 points

either have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Rogue@feddit.uk
2 points

Date based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y).

At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 945

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments

Community moderators