https://archive.ph/vEoA7

The idea that the Earth is a sphere was all but settled by ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle (384–322 BC), who obtained empirical evidence after travelling to Egypt and seeing new constellations of stars. Eratosthenes, in the third century BC, became the first person to calculate the circumference of the Earth. Islamic scholars made further advanced measurements from about the 9th century AD onwards, while European navigators circled the Earth in the 16th century. Images from space were final proof, if any were needed.

Today’s flat-Earth believers are not, though, the first to doubt what seems unquestionable. The notion of a flat Earth initially resurfaced in the 1800s as a backlash to scientific progress, especially among those who wished to return to biblical literalism. Perhaps the most famous proponent was the British writer Samuel Rowbotham (1816–1884). He proposed the Earth is a flat immovable disc, centred at the North Pole, with Antarctica replaced by an ice wall at the disc’s outer boundary.

The International Flat Earth Research Society, which was set up in 1956 by Samuel Shenton, a signwriter living in Dover, UK, was regarded by many people as merely a symbol of British eccentricity – amusing and of little consequence. But in the early 2000s, with the Internet now a well-established vehicle for off-beat views, the idea began to bubble up again, mostly in the US. Discussions sprouted in online forums, the Flat Earth Society was relaunched in October 2009 and the annual flat-Earth conference began in earnest.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-2 points

Drag has decided not to discuss the quantum gravity problem, and just reassert that drag is a gravity believer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

at a certain point the question isn’t whether a formula is “right or wrong”, it’s about whether what the formula says is “good enough in this situation” or whether a different formula should be chosen.

This is an important topic in physics: choose the right frame of reference, the right simplifications, the right assumptions, … for your calculations to be as easy as possible, yet meaningful.

So i guess to “believe” in a formula is just to recognize and accept its usefulness for a purpose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You have a weird way of talking. For example, it’s not normal to call Newton and Einstein “wrong” in their equations about gravity just because they did not happen to solve all of physics while writing them down…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Excellent Reads

!longreads@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.

Community stats

  • 736

    Monthly active users

  • 239

    Posts

  • 600

    Comments