You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-6 points

I don’t see how we would have smartphones without capitalism. We’d still all be farmers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Without capitalism, we’d all have the ability to swap out parts and create a phone for the purposes that we need. Some people want the best while others want the minimum, and most want something in between. Every part would be replaceable.

With capitalism, we have planned obsolescence without the ability to repair or replace parts and every conceivable thing to reap more money off us and force us to continually consume.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m saying without the greed of capitalism we wouldn’t have phones to swap out parts. We would have very limited technology because the incentive to innovate is much less when you do it because you want to rather than earning extra resources to raise standards of living(greed). Not as many people will volunteering their entire lives to come up with new technology while living the same standard of living as a farmer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I get what you’re saying but, respectfully, I think you’re incorrect. The field of science is not about capitalism but the goal of understanding everything around you. Aqueducts were not the result of capitalism. Russia won the space race. Innovations happen regardless. Capitalism drives innovation in specific directions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m saying without the greed of capitalism we wouldn’t have phones to swap out parts.

This might be a hot take but I’m not sure we all need a phone in our pocket or that it’s inherently a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

“When they say ‘there is no alternative to capitalism’, they do not make a observation. They make a demand. They demand to not think about alternatives.”

You missed patch 1917 on eurasian servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You know capitalism is really new in the scale of human history right? It wasn’t until the industrial revolution in the 18th century that the means of production could be privately owned which then allowed for further speculative capital (stocks, land value, etc) to be equated to power.

The people of the past weren’t inherently stupid. Plenty of scientific and cultural progress was made prior to capitalism being our economic model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What were most people doing before the industrial revolution? Farming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Most were farmers because humans needed food, and food productivity was low before the age of industrialization. Not really sure what you are trying to argue other than it took a long time for enough progress was made to free humans to presue other things other than farming their land.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

weird that not everyone was a farmer before capitalism then

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 7.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments