In conclusion, the rise of AI washing represents a significant challenge that demands immediate attention from state attorneys general and other regulatory bodies. AGs can play a pivotal role in mitigating the risks of misleading AI claims by providing clear definitions, fostering consumer awareness, and strategically leveraging AI tools. These efforts are not merely about protecting consumers’ wallets; they are about safeguarding trust in emerging technologies and ensuring that innovation continues to serve, rather than deceive, the public. As AI technologies become increasingly integrated into daily life, regulatory frameworks must keep pace, striking a balance between fostering innovation and holding companies accountable. The stakes are high, but with proactive measures, regulators can ensure that AI enhances rather than erodes consumer confidence.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
12 points

Misleading title, it makes you think Only Fans is doing something right, but all it says it’s plagued by AI bots and people pay to talk to AI bots. So TLDR is Only Fans is fuckedup beyond repair and officials should look that as an example on how to protect their consumers.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

“…should learn from OnlyFans disaster”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.zip

Create post

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 6.1K

    Comments

Community moderators