You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points

Petition to replace “motte and bailey” per the Batman clause with “lying like a dipshit”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I fucking love how goddamn structured kym is ito semiotics and symbolism

it’s an amazing confluence that might not have happened if persons unknown didn’t care, but they did. and thus we have it! phenomenal

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Isn’t this a case of ‘the good bits are not original and the original bits are not good’. According to wikipedia it is from 2005.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

various forms of equivocation

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I don’t see what useful information the motte and bailey lingo actually conveys that equivocation and deception and bait-and-switch didn’t. And I distrust any turn of phrase popularized in the LessWrong-o-sphere. If they like it, what bad mental habits does it appeal to?

The original coiner appears to be in with the brain-freezing crowd. He’s written about the game theory of “braving the woke mob” for a Tory rag.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators