Using ableist language as insults is always bad, even if the words seem innocuous. Some may reference the “euphemism treadmill” to try to justify their behavior, but it’s crucial to understand that the treadmill is merely a linguistic observation. It does not exist to normalize ableist behavior.

what is the euphemism treadmill for those who dont want to google

more reading if bored

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
62 points

Neurodivergent isn’t an insult…

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Not YET!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

With that theory, any word could become an insult.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bingo. I assumed more people understood this, so I apologize for not communicating clearly. Any word can become an insult—with the right people in control. What’s particularly hurtful is seeing words that marginalized or oppressed groups use to describe their own experiences being co-opted and turned into insults, reinforcing their otherness.

It happened with “retard,” as with “idiot,” and so many others. Recently, I’ve seen it happen with more niche phrases (look up “is X acoustic” if you’re unfamiliar). Just the other day, I made a comment that I could see two perspectives on a matter. Instead of simply calling me wrong, someone said, “You must be neurodivergent, you’re so gullible.” In that context, “neurodivergent” was clearly being used as a stand-in for the r-slur.

To be clear, I am not against any language. I’m against the weaponizing of language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s the attitude one would expect from such a high class individual.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Correct

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

“Cisgender” isn’t an insult either, but that doesn’t stop Elon Musk and his flunkies from treating it as such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

mega fax

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

correct, it’s not (or shouldn’t be), but it’s being used as one, especially recently!

precontext: i said i could see both sides of some non-important debate. something about whether a community mod should be heavy or light with bans, and i was like, “well it depends on what the motivations and needs are.”

their response to that?

in this post i hope to call attention to the same destructive processes happening to “neurodiverse” as to all the other terms. particularly i want to call out the ableist motivations behind it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah and I could call you a wet blanket for not realizing words can be used however the fuck you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

fully agree, as i have said here and here.

unfortunately, blocked for being mean about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You can use gay, homosexual, homo habilis as insults

That doesnt make these words bad

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

precisely? never said otherwise :) to quote another person right in this thread whom i agree with:

It’s an insult because of intent, not because of the word itself, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Without the context it doesn’t come off as insulting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

It’s an insult because of intent, not because of the word itself, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

oh absolutely :) would never disagree with you here 💯💯💯

permalink
report
parent
reply