You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
14 points

If you agree that it will never be perfect at filtering out sensitive information, why support it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Because malware is already using such methods to steal credentials, so by having something “legitimate” work towards preventing such situations, a countermeasure will eventually be born.

Right now, all kind of applications take screenshots and send data without user’s knowledge. If something like blurring can trigger automatically and modify what is being sent, then the user will have some protection available instead of none.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Recall is not anti-malware though, the mal-ware can still do its own data gleaning. This is just an AI feature solving a problem that nobody had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Many problems in the past were solved by inventions that were meant for other things. Seeing something for what it is and ignoring its untapped potential is a narrow view of life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

how will capturing screenshots prevent other software from capturing screenshots?

And we all know countermeasures don’t exist. They can be used to train the ais out of their own existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Depends. Can anyone with the know-how create a custom way of taking a screenshot/capture independent of all others or do all methods have to use an immutable function as the base?

If the former, i agree with you. If the latter, you’re kinda wrong to believe so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Programs can already be refused from being able to view screen contents. If malware is able to circumvent this, why do you believe it would abide by the filtering rules? Further, if you really do believe this is useful, Microsoft could implement this technology without also randomly screenshotting your computer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

If a malware bypasses a function directly, then closing that loophole would force future versions to find more complicated ways of achieving the same thing, which makes them more visible in the long run.

Edit: Also, Microsoft sucks. But now that the ugly crap is out there, you’ll come to face it eventually. Why not be more prepared?

permalink
report
parent
reply

privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ca

Create post

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

Community stats

  • 990

    Monthly active users

  • 123

    Posts

  • 218

    Comments