When George Lai of Portland, Oregon, took his toddler son to a pediatrician last summer for a checkup, the doctor noticed a little splinter in the child’s palm. “He must have gotten it between the front door and the car,” Lai later recalled, and the child wasn’t complaining. The doctor grabbed a pair of forceps — aka tweezers — and pulled out the splinter in “a second,” Lai said. That brief tug was transformed into a surgical billing code: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 10120, “incision and removal of a foreign body, subcutaneous” — at a cost of $414.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
2 points

Are y’all saying that it should have been done for free, in the system we are currently in? What should have been the CPT? That is, unfortunately, the most correct coding there is for that. Should there be a lesser code? It is easy to argue there should be. But, to chart otherwise is considered fraud.

Also, the charges are ‘fake’ anyway, as it is a stupid game that is played to get insurances to actually pay anything.

permalink
report
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@midwest.social

Create post

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 4.4K

    Comments