lab grown meat is a vaguely EA/rationalist/self IDed neolib meme. in theory it will save the environment (ok) and prevent suffering (yay) in a way that concentrates capital (double yay) and involves a lot of tech magic (triple yay).

hot luigi is a big fan apparently. seeing this discussed reminded me of this excellent article which shreds the concept of mass produced lab grown meat. I haven’t really seen this circulate much over the years, but it is really a masterwork of grift dissection. please enjoy

archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20241208141305/https://thecounter.org/lab-grown-cultivated-meat-cost-at-scale/

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points
*

at least make a pretense of having read the article instead of very obviously reacting to the headline jfc

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I read the article and nothing there contradicts the commenters opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s the power of not saying anything interesting, you can’t contradict it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

The article doesn’t say anything interesting in the first place.

“Start-ups optimistic about future of their product, wish for public investment, expert disagrees.”

That’s about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The article itself does mention that creating cultured meat is already possible, just that the limits of the technology presently known for doing it make creating it at the same cost as regular meat infeasible. Which technically doesn’t contradict with what the person you replied to said, because the commenter didn’t exactly say how expensive or niche they expected it to be, so even something like a hundred dollar hamburger that doesn’t replace a significant fraction of food consumption but does exist as a novelty luxury for someone that had the money to spend on animal protein once in a blue moon, fits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

fwiw the post this is replying to originally didn’t have the phrase “instead of very obviously reacting to the headline,” I edited that in later. without the edit I think it does come across like I thought zweibel was contradicting some specific point in the article. not true, b/c they didn’t address the article at all

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Did that locker just say “but it was technically correct”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Locker?

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators