694

Startup will brick $800 emotional support robot for kids without refunds(arstechnica.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Xatolos@reddthat.com
in
Avatar
technology@lemmy.world
120 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
34 points

It sounds like they literally can’t refund people because the company completely ran out of money and is gonna be liquidated. Sucky situation for all parties involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
0 points

I bet they can

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
intensely_human@lemm.ee
2 points

Unless they don’t have the money in which case they can’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
uis@lemm.ee
20 points

If only there was law demanding to refund broken products before liquidation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Blackmist@feddit.uk
0 points

And who is going to pay for that? If they could afford to refund all their customers they wouldn’t be going bust.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Zagorath@lemm.ee
2 points

The law would probably make sure customers whose products are being bricked are counted as creditors. Ideally after employees (unpaid wages) and before investors. They may not get full refunds, but they’ll be entitled to something if it’s possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
uis@lemm.ee
1 point
*

Liquidatoon doesn’t mean they have no money. And they still have some assets.

Also that’s why we should apply mandatory copy laws to software too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
bizarroland@fedia.io
22 points

Or a law stating that in the case fair refunds can not be provided that the software needed for running the hardware becomes public domain and is published and released on a git maintained by the library of Congress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
uis@lemm.ee
5 points

Yes please. And mandatory copy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Corngood@lemmy.ml
3 points

Surely in that case they could open their software so the community can figure out what it would take to keep it running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
TachyonTele@lemm.ee
1 point

I think at this point they have far more important things to worry about than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
BakerBagel@midwest.social
8 points

Their creditors would sue because thats an asset that can be sold to refund them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Corngood@lemmy.ml
2 points

Yeah, likely true without some sort of legislation.

Well at least there’s a business opportunity for someone to reanimate these things and use them to push gacha games and energy drinks on the innocent children they’ve bonded with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Zak@lemmy.world
3 points

What they probably can do is issue an update that lets owners point it at third-party servers, and publish the API. They might even be able to publish the source code, though there’s a chance they don’t own all of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments

Community moderators