Electric cars are not THE solution.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points
*

A tire that lasts a lifetime would shed less particles than one that needs replacing every so many miles all the tires used in the same timeframe, would it not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Rubber+friction=micro plastics

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Rubber is quite literally the sap of a rubber tree. Latex. They mix other materials in with it, but this is one instance where I don’t think the rubber is the issue.

It’s the fillers they put in the rubber; Nylon, Rayon, Polyester, etc.

Tires are about 25% steel fibers, another 30%ish filler materials, and Rubber (either synthetic or natural)

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The reason tires need replacing is because they’re relatively thin. Airless tires aren’t wear-less tires.

Not to mention that airless tires make for a horrible ride.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Actually earlier prototypes were wear-less, from both companies that were developing them.

As for the horrible ride, from what I’ve seen, that’s not a problem. But even if it was perhaps that should be solved by other aspects of the car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

There is, fundamentally, one measurement that defines everything about the performance characteristics of a car: the amount of force it can impart on the road (and vice versa). This single measure defines its limits of acceleration, turning and braking. And what determines how much of that force is available?

The tires, and the coefficient of friction of the rubber compound they’re made of, which is directly related to how quickly they wear. Every possible solution that makes tires wear less will also make cars perform worse.

…Well, short of drastically reducing weight (i.e. making a bicycle instead of a car).

…Or swapping them out for steel and running the thing on rails (i.e. making a train instead of a car).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’re not prototypes, they exist and they’re called tweels. They’re only really useful for low-speed industrial equipment where ride quality is a low priority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not if the way it lasts a lifetime is by being made of the same material that wears off but being made of more of it. 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Here’s the problem with tires.

If you want long treadwear, you use harder material. But then you get worse traction.

If you want good traction, you use softer material. But then you get worse treadwear.

If you want a car to perform safely on public roads, its tires necessarily need to wear away as they are used. Electric vehicles are presently even worse on tires, as they weigh so much more than ICE vehicles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The amount of time a tire lasts ultimately has fuck-all to do with whether it’s airless or penumatic; it has to do with how much traction it provides and how large/heavy a vehicle it’s supporting. Any tire that is good at its job of providing traction to a big, heavy vehicle like an automobile (and SUVs / EVs / EV SUVs only make this worse) is going to pollute a fuck-ton compared to, say, a bicycle tire or the steel wheel on rail public transit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators