You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

I just don’t see how we can reconcile the two. People want to hear her sing and they’re willing to pay a lot for it.

The main alternative I can think of is for her to sing for free and have the government pay for the production of her shows. As popular as she is I can’t see that going over well. Putting the arts under political control leads to the unnecessary politicization of the arts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or, hear me out: tax the rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@midwest.social

Create post

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 4.4K

    Comments