33

Enterprise has no idea what to do with generative AI. This means it’s early days, and not that AI is a bubble(pivot-to-ai.com)

posted
by
Avatar
David Gerard@awful.systemsM
in
Avatar
techtakes@awful.systems
12 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
Thorry84@feddit.nl
26 points

I’ve also been involved with projects that were retro-activly renamed to AI. Implemented a new oldskool search algorithm? That’s AI now! Simple decision tree with static weights? AI!

Nobody wants investors or customers to think you’re doing a bad job not putting AI in stuff, even if it doesn’t really help or isn’t a use case for anything related to AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
24 points

To be fair, simple decision trees with static weights used to be AI. Look, I learned how to do A* search from an AI textbook. AI is just algorithms with delusions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 417

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators