Journalists flock to Bluesky as X becomes increasingly 'toxic'(www.nbcnews.com)

Again, I’m not saying this is a good thing, merely that it’s interesting. I would like a platform that’s properly diverse, and this is one interesting metric. However, given that total userbase has dropped, I wonder if it’s more attrition than anything that caused the balance. In any case, it’ll be interesting to see where it ends up, and hopefully it’s not just another Truth Social…

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Echo Dot@feddit.uk

7 points

1 month ago

The problem is if he is boosting right-wing viewpoints and suppressing left-wing viewpoints then all the casual viewer ends up seeing is the right-wing viewpoints.

So just because left-wing content is on there doesn’t mean people can easily access or find it.

So it’s not really balanced in any way.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

-2 points

1 month ago

I honestly haven’t used Twitter/X in any meaningful capacity, so I don’t know what that looks like. But if he continually adjusts the algorithm to show a good mix, that would be a good thing. If he keeps pushing right wing stuff, it’ll end up like Truth Social.

If the CNN report is accurate (and I have no reason to suspect it’s not), then it’s probably in a good place. We’ll see in a few months though.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Echo Dot@feddit.uk

1 point

1 month ago

if he continually adjusts the algorithm to show a good mix, that would be a good thing.

Have you been living under a rock or something? He isn’t doing that, stop trying to argue a situation that doesn’t exist. He’s pushing right-wing extremist propaganda in order to get near Trump.

He’s not balancing anything.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

0 points

30 days ago

I don’t use Twitter/X, I just see outrage here on Lemmy and other left-leaning media orgs like CNN. So I take that outrage with a grain of salt, especially since those same groups disliked Musk before he bought Twitter. I dislike Musk too, but I try to not let that color my perception of what he’s actually accomplished.

So I’m hesitant to take those complaints at face value. I didn’t like Twitter before Musk bought it, and I like it less now, but that doesn’t mean a whole lot, which is why I rely on statistics like these to help cut through the BS from the big media firms.

If you can point to actual tangible facts and not cherry picked content, we can have a discussion. I provided mine, and the stats look promising.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

Echo Dot@feddit.uk

1 point

30 days ago

I’d like you to demonstrate where this discussion I linked to “cherry-picked content”. I do not believe you are arguing in good faith and are trying the very tired “I’m a centralist” argument. That road ran out about a decade ago.

I’m going to be in honest, I’m not going to go out of my way to try and find information that is very easily publicly available. Your refusal to be even moderately informed about current events is your problem, not mine.

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

Community stats

14K
Monthly active users
6.8K
Posts
157K
Comments

Our Rules

Approved Bots

Community stats

Community moderators