You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
10 points

Great way to lose customers

Having said that, what’s up with the “unhoused” thing? It homeless. Are we now calling it differently because homeless is now all of the sudden insulting? How long until “unhoused” suddenly is a bad word?

Can we please just stop pushing changing words? Homeless is fine, you’re without a home. It sucks, people should support you, not shun you, but changing words is just virtue signalling that doesn’t do anything to make anything better for anyone

permalink
report
reply
4 points

but changing words is just virtue signalling that doesn’t do anything to make anything better for anyone

… And if you are the type of neoliberal politician that wants to pretend they care about people while never actually doing anything to help anyone other than the megacorps when you get into power – Then this is literally all you’ll ever do for people. Linguistic fuckery. Making up new words for things. Fucking around with definitions. And you know that there will be an army of people who will defend this, and shoot down people who actually want to do something on grounds that they said the “wrong” words.

The argument for ‘unhoused’ is that it humanises the person – But it’s really pushing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, this… Stop haggling with words, actually do something to fix it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Spoiler: they won’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Homeless what, exactly? Sorry, you’re gonna need to throw in the word “person” just to be clear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I’ll asume y’all are stupid and privileged and not just cruel. Home can be a public shelter, it is about people. A house is a thing you rent or own.

Not everything is politics, virtue signaling or about you. We use different words because language changes, because society changes. That is why you don’t speak Anglo-Saxon anymore.

It’s about precision. The condition people are talking about is not having a house, regardless of whether they have a home. This is why unhoused is being used more often.

It’s not part of an agenda, it is not about you. Grow up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not precise. A shelter is just that: shelter, not a home. An apartment can be a home, but is not a house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Of course! Relax. It’s more precise to be clear they’re talking about people unhoused.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 7K

    Monthly active users

  • 694

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments

Community moderators