You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
38 points

I’m sure they had good reasons to make the switch, but I don’t really understand the argument about kernel and ruby versions. An upgrade to the newest LTS release would have gotten them ruby 3.2 and probably a newer kernel as well.

To resolve these, OpenStreetMap needed to switch to newer mainline kernels, naturally leading them toward Debian.

Because Debian is known for its up to date software, right? Gave me a good chuckle.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

That article is so bad. While still debatable, what he actually said wasn’t anything like it’s been represented.

On Debian 12 we could simply install the backport kernel and the performance issues were solved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Because Debian is known for its up to date software, right? Gave me a good chuckle.

stable is not the only debian release. Additionally, while ubuntu may be great for beginners or corporate offices, it really does suck compared to other distros. They’ve added so much garbage and guardrails the performance is dog shit (in comparison to other distros like debian).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Moving distros to get a new version of ruby is some amateur shit.

The distro ruby is for distro ruby app packages. It is not really meant for people to build their software against.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@programming.dev

Create post

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 565

    Posts

  • 4.9K

    Comments