You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The legal system is the perfect place for working out nuanced issues like this.

If I were a lawyer and making this lawsuit I would argue that “publicly available” does not mean “public domain”, and that without acquiring usage rights for the data then you don’t have the right to use the data.

If the courts rule against a decision like this then that would mean that any website that hosts any materials that can be accessed without an account must then provide that material to any person who accesses it free of charge which is a gigantic consequence to this nuanced issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’d just bury them in GDPR notices, which quite a few people did

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A data set isn’t like a photocopier in any meaningful way.

It’s not a tool, it’s information, and some of it counts as personal data under EU data protection laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators